Skip to main content

Japanese dovetails


Some time ago, I made a dovetailed chest with the remainder of my brown oak. The chest was built (oddly) for myself, and was originally going to be my regular, bog standard dovetails. Since the chest was for myself, I decided to stray away from a regular dovetail. I mean, if I screwed them up who cares? As long as the chest was functional, it was only me that would see them. Ironically, I know it would have made my brain itch, if they where really bad.

From start to finish, the dovetails were task intensive, meaning there was a lot of repetitive tasks, basically there was pretty much double of everything. The marking out, saw cuts and the time in general, to make these joints grew exponentially. This is not evident on a first glance of a joint like this, or at least not for me it's not. I'm usually in Orr for some time, admiring the joint, then I dissect the joint, and then, only sometimes, I'll consider the time it will take me to make the joint.

So for me, I treated these dovetails like regular dovetail, in the way/process I make dovetails. I started with the tail portion first. The layout and cutting was pretty straight forward, other than there was a lot of cuts. The shoulders got removed as per usual.

The pin section was difficult to mark out, because there was only a saw kerf thickness at the entrance, and the material was 1" thick which posed problems. Even a pencil with a lengthened, slimmed down tip was awkward, which is my usual go to. The Stanley blade on my marking knife was a struggle, and I'm not a fan of this method, so I stuck with the pencil.


The joint (corner 1) didn't turn out to bad, considering I struggled to mark out the pins accurately, and it was my first attempt at the joint. It was pointed out to me, that cutting the pins first would be the way to go, more so with this joint. Even though I'm a tails first guy, I agreed with the statement, which made sense since I was struggling transferring pencil lines. Ironically, the corner with the pins first turned out the worst. Yes, it was way easier to mark out, but I ended up going to the tails first approach. Could this have been a placebo, bad luck, bad craftsmanship, lack of experience with the joint? It could've been one, all or none! I do however think there was at least two at play.

When I finished all the corner, it was made very evident how much more stronger, the joint was compared to a regular dovetail. I even balanced my weight on one corner (not advisable), while only two pieces were connected, and it never budged. This is a seriously strong joint, and doesn't come apart easily when unglued. I did originally decided to leave the joints unglued but, at the last minute, I changed my mind, and I really wish I had left them unglued, just as an experiment. I've no doubt I will carry out the experiment, with a similar structure to satisfy my curiosity.

The chest now sits in my bedroom heavy and stout, this thing would survive a fallout. It is however a shame that the joints never get shown off, and pictures just never seem to do it justice!

LINKS









Comments

  1. Looks amazing. A cut (literally) above the usual dovetails.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Using the roman workbench

Earlier this year, I read a few articles from the lost press art, about the roman workbench, then again with mortise and tenon magazine, which peaked my interest. I must admit I was impressed, but also sceptical. I mean most of us use a tall bench, with a vise, and only see a chair maker use a similar bench. For this reason, and because we don't know any different, we think we won't be able to carry out, some tasks. I wanted to build one, so that I could use it outside, especially with summer almost here. It appealed to me, with the fact, that I could just pick it up, and carry it outside. Also, the fact that I needed an extra saw horse, pretty much sold it to me. Any one who uses saw horses for sawing with hand saws, on a regular basis will know that, a bench of this size, will make life very easy for this task, because of large amount of surface area. So I built this with the idea that, in the worse case scenario, I had a very good saw bench. So it wasn't a bi

Roman workbench perfection?

So as you know (if you follow me on social media), I have just recently built, yet another Roman workbench! Which is starting to become normal practice, just as much as it is me saying "I think this will be the last one I build". Every time I build a bench, I do get closer to the optimal bench, and preferences are becoming crystal clear! I think the most predominant preference has to be the width. I seem to lean towards 15", it just seems like a nice width, for me to sit on and work on. My oak bench is the narrowest bench I have built, which I really don't like because of the width. That's a real shame, considering I like the length, and it has a shavehorse attachment. I would definitely say, I prefer a longer bench to a shorter bench. To date I have explored 4', 5' and 6', with 6' being my favourite. Don't get me wrong, I have built all manner of furniture on the 4' but, the 6' bench rules simply because, I am able to have

Exploring joints.

If you were to mention a woodworking joint, to a non woodworker, they would probably know of a joint/have a picture in there head, and think nothing more than the joint, joins two sections of wood together. Of course this is true however, there is a lot more to a joint, then just joining two sections of wood together. This often gets over looked by people, and they do not understand the mechanics of the joint. Which seems a shame, considering that understanding joints, will help you better choose a good joint, on a structure you may be designing, which will ultimately strengthen that structure. I think a lot of people choose a joint, because they know it to be strong, because someone said so, and without question, not fully understanding why they are using it. Take the good old dovetail in drawer construction. The pin portion will always be on the front of the drawer, because of the nature of a dovetail joint. The pins are like a group of wedges, fitting into wedge like gro